CAMBRIDGE AUDIO TOPAZ AM10 INTEGRATED AMPLIFIER & CD10 CD PLAYER

車呀文

拆開計，每邊2500

gooseling

I have got the SR 10 receiver ! The sound is very nice ,for rock or classical !

uncleting

呢set 真係幾抵玩,對於鍾意人聲同曲樂嘅愛好者係不錯嘅選擇
35W一般家庭夠晒聽

wildmant

柒喜 發表於 2013-9-16 12:56

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

我說我話：房間細少，預算不多，不再藉口 擴音機連CD 唱盤也不到五千，能挑起你的入門意慾嗎？這兩 ...

你何不先翻譯然後將它張貼呀?

auraheart

柒喜 發表於 2013-9-16 17:12

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

配高效率喇叭仔就OK

配高效率喇叭仔 not mcot, I like low efficiency big, heavy speakers. This integrated amp might match well with Rogers LS 3/5A, even it is kinda not "loud speakers".  However, I did use a 25 Watts power amp years ago, was surprisingly good (Bedini 25/25 + Quad ESL speakers).

柒喜

uncleting 發表於 2013-9-16 23:37

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

呢set 真係幾抵玩,對於鍾意人聲同曲樂嘅愛好者係不錯嘅選擇
35W一般家庭夠晒聽

翻就無問題，無時間打

柒喜

auraheart 發表於 2013-9-17 00:21

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

配高效率喇叭仔 not mcot, I like low efficiency big, heavy speakers. This integrated amp might matc ...

Bedini 25/25 至夾 Quad ESL多年前聽過舊款ESL，人聲和小品無敵，低頻乾淨快速，但量稍嫌不夠，聽大型差點點，可而且ohm數會跌，幾考功放，水塘弱D都比佢扯乾

auraheart

柒喜 發表於 2013-9-17 01:03

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Bedini 25/25 至夾 Quad ESL多年前聽過舊款ESL，人聲和小品無敵，低頻乾淨快速，但量稍嫌不夠，聽 ...

The Bedini 25/25 was mostly driving the hi/mid range.  Had the Decca ribbon super tweeters and Audio Pro sub-woofer with 100 watt amp build-in.  Was the only low power transistor amp I ever used, but very good.

柒喜

auraheart 發表於 2013-9-17 03:07

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

The Bedini 25/25 was mostly driving the hi/mid range.  Had the Decca ribbon tweeters and Audio Pro ...

玩ESL大都加超低，舊款最難搞係音壓唔夠，到90dB已經極限。喇叭阻抗又大上大落，音頻一到10KHz時阻抗竟跌至1ohm，不知幾多功放比佢玩謝

auraheart

回復 柒喜 #49 的帖子

Isn't it makes the Hi Fi World wonderful? hehe....fun , challenging  and burning $$ along the way.  I actually learned how to design audio circuits in college long ago, the more I knew, the worst it got...and that was not it...I love music and singing....dammmmn !!! LOL..

auraheart

柒喜 發表於 2013-9-17 06:36

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

玩ESL大都加超低，舊款最難搞係音壓唔夠，到90dB已經極限。喇叭阻抗又大上大落，音頻一到10KHz時阻抗竟跌至1ohm，不知幾多功放比佢玩謝

That was the reason why I added a pair of Decca ribbon super tweeters, it takes over at about 7khz and impedance is kept at 8 ohm or a bit above.  In actual listening environment, it adds noticeable harmonics and very lovely.  Maybe why Mark Levenson chose Decca for his H.Q.D. system (D for Decca).

ricerice76

it is a nice audio system

lomei

柒喜 發表於 2013-9-16 16:51

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

最重要夠平

咁更係

柒喜

lomei 發表於 2013-9-17 11:48

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

咁更係

無得再平

觀月瞳

柒喜 發表於 2013-9-16 22:51

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

無得再平

有排子應該武

auraheart

Checked the web and The AM10 might not be well build.  SMALL toroidal  transformer and really tiny filtering caps.  Looks like no so good voltage regulation before out-put stage, circuit board looks too simple.  I seriouly doubt if the amp will clip at full out-put.  Additional specs by manufacture listed below:

35 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms (20-20,000 Hz), 0.15% THD at 80% of rated power
signal-to-noise ratio: 82 dB
large toroidal power transformer for low noise and high-current output
5 RCA audio inputs, including a phono input for connecting a turntable
front-panel minijack input for connecting a portable music player
RCA record output
full-size headphone jack
one pair of binding-post speaker terminals
sleek brushed aluminium exterior
remote control
16-15/16"W x 2-15/16"H x 14-5/16"D
weight: 12.3 lbs.
warranty: 3 years

柒喜

auraheart 發表於 2013-9-17 17:34

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Checked the web and The AM10 might not be well build.  SMALL toroidal  transformer and really tiny f ...

你講得無錯，此機絕不適合過大音壓，否則輕則會拆，嚴重會扯乾電容燒機，筆者亦有提及不宜過大音壓。一分錢一分貨，也不能苛求二千零蚊比足靚料

auraheart

觀月瞳 發表於 2013-9-17 16:38

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

有排子應該武

You might like to check out NAD C 316BEE 40 Watts integrated amp, much better specs. ($379.95 USD)

auraheart

柒喜 發表於 2013-9-17 18:02

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

你講得無錯，此機絕不適合過大音壓，否則輕則會拆，嚴重會扯乾電容燒機，筆者亦有提及不宜過大音壓。一分錢一分貨，也不能苛求二千零蚊比足靚料

I can't agree more, but clipping could also destroy speaker drivers and cross-over due to over heat.

柒喜

auraheart 發表於 2013-9-18 04:19

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

I can't agree more, but clipping could also destroy speaker drivers and cross-over due to over hea ...

35Wpc doesn’t sound like a lot of power. But let’s put this in context. Amps only know they’re small in a big room or with the wrong speaker. Shackled to a low-sensitivity loudspeaker in a palatial listening room and urged to perform routinely in the 95dB+ range, we would indeed have a Houston-level problem. But that’s not the AM10’s job description. The AM10 exists for the smaller application—to provide high-level musicality in tighter confines.

筆者早說明此機應匹配什麼，況且絕大多情況聽音樂也甚少將音壓調至95dB，如長期維持此音壓不用4小時足以令耳朵永久損害。你講既無錯，功放clipping是非常危險的事，以往我第一套西裝山水就clipping暗而燒毀喇叭，現今大多擴音都有保護電路，除非蓄意將音量調至極限。